Commodification and healthcare in the third sector in England: from gift to commodity—and back?

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IMPACT: This article suggests why a different approach may be required for commissioning services from third sector providers than from, say, corporate or public providers. English systems for commissioning third sector providers contain both commodified elements (for example formal procurement, provider competition, commissioner–provider separation) and collaborative, relational elements (for example long-term collaboration, reliance on inter-organizational networks). When the two elements conflicted, commissioners and third sector organizations tended to try to work around the commodified elements in order to preserve and develop the collaborative aspects, which suggests that, in practice, they find de-commodified, collaborative methods better adapted to the commissioning of third sector organizations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheaff, R., Ellis-Paine, A., Exworthy, M., Hardwick, R., & Smith, C. Q. (2024). Commodification and healthcare in the third sector in England: from gift to commodity—and back? Public Money and Management, 44(4), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2244350

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free