Management of low-grade glioma

123Citations
Citations of this article
216Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The optimal management of patients with lowgrade glioma (LGG) is controversial. The controversy largely stems from the lack of well-designed clinical trials with adequate follow-up to account for the relatively long progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with LGG. Nonetheless, the literature increasingly suggests that expectant management is no longer optimal. Rather, there is mounting evidence supporting active management including consideration of surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecular and histopathologic characterization, and use of modern imaging techniques for monitoring and prognostication. In particular, there is growing evidence favoring extensive surgical resection and increasing interest in the role of chemotherapy (especially temozolomide) in the management of these tumors. In this review, we critically analyze emerging trends in the literature with respect to management of LGG, with particular emphasis on reports published during the past year. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pouratian, N., & Schiff, D. (2010, May). Management of low-grade glioma. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-010-0105-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free