Twenty-year experience of heart transplantation: Early and long-term results

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated early and long-term results after heart transplantation (HTPL). Methods: One hundred five consecutive patients (male:female=80:25) who underwent HTPL between 1994 and 2013 were enrolled. Based on the changes in immunosuppressive regimen, the study patients were divided into two groups. Early and long-term clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared between the patients who underwent HTPL before (group E, n=41) and after July 2009 (group L, n=64). The group L patients were older (p < 0.001), had higher incidence of hypertension (p=0.001) and chronic kidney disease (p < 0.001), and more frequently needed preoperative mechanical ventilation (p=0.027) and mechanical circulatory support (p=0.014) than the group E patients. Results: Overall operative mortality was 3.8%, and postoperative morbidities included acute kidney injury (n=31), respiratory complications (n=16), reoperation for bleeding (n=15) and wound complications (n=10). There were no significant differences in early results except acute kidney injury between group E and group L patients. Overall survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 83.8%, 67.7%, and 54.9%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two patient groups. Rejection-free rates at 1 and 5 years were 63.0% and 59.7%, respectively; rates were significantly higher in group L than in group E (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Despite increased preoperative comorbidities, group L patients showed similar early and long-term outcomes and significantly higher rejection-free rates when compared with group E patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, J. H., Yeom, S. Y., Hwang, H. Y., Choi, J. W., Cho, H. J., Lee, H. Y., … Kim, K. B. (2016). Twenty-year experience of heart transplantation: Early and long-term results. Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 49(4), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.4.242

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free