Caring task-involving climate leads to greater improvements in free-throw shooting biomechanics and motivational responses

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: There is a need for experimental and cross-disciplinary research in sport psychology, particularly studies that incorporate objective performance assessments into motivational climate research. Methods: This investigation examined biomechanical changes in athletes’ free-throw shooting form in response to the motivational climate during a basketball clinic, as well as affect, demand and resource appraisals, and motivational outcomes. Thirty-nine male basketball players were assigned to a free-throw clinic with either a caring, task-involving (CTI) climate, where high effort and improvement are valued and recognized and mistakes are part of learning or an ego-involving (EI) climate, where winning is prioritized, athletes are punished for mistakes, and star players are favored. Participants completed pre- and post-clinic surveys. Video analysis allowed for the assessment of free-throw kinematics (e.g., knee flexion) pre- and post-clinic. Results: No baseline group differences were found. At post-assessment, the CTI group’s shooting kinematics more closely resembled those of proficient shooters compared to the EI group. Individuals in the EI climate perceived the clinic as more demanding and reported a significant increase in negative affect. In contrast, CTI participants reported significantly greater positive affect, effort, and interest and excitement to continue practicing. Discussion: Findings suggest creating a CTI climate can enhance motivation and facilitate player development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hogue, C. M., Cabarkapa, D., Fry, M. D., Fry, A. C., Wineinger, T. O., & Chamberlin, J. M. (2025). Caring task-involving climate leads to greater improvements in free-throw shooting biomechanics and motivational responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1667429

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free