Clinical safety and utility of pediatric balloon-Assisted enteroscopy: A multicenter prospective study in japan

15Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives:The benefit of balloon-Assisted enteroscopy (BAE) had been recently documented in pediatric patients, but previous reports are based on single institution experiences. We evaluated the feasibility of pediatric BAE in 8 tertiary referral hospitals throughout Japan.Methods:This was a prospective, multi-institutional study. Patients younger than 18 years were enrolled between April 2014 and March 2017 to undergo double-balloon or single-balloon enteroscopy. Data were collected prospectively using a standardized questionnaire.Results:We enrolled 79 pediatric patients (96 procedures, 70 boys, 26 girls; median age 12.7 years, range 1-17 years). Antegrade (oral-route) BAE was performed in 20 procedures (lowest body weight 12.9kg, youngest age 3.7 years), and retrograde (anal-route) BAE in 76 (lowest body weight 10.8kg, youngest age 1.6 years). Severe adverse events were associated with BAE in 2 patients: 1 with hemorrhage due to polypectomy and 1 with pancreatitis after double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy. No intestinal perforation was reported. Procedure duration of oral-route BAE for diagnosis was significantly longer than anal-route for diagnosis (P<0.001). The overall diagnostic yield for rectal bleeding/positive fecal occult blood test and abdominal pain was 48%. Among 40 patients referred for diagnosis who did not undergo capsule endoscopy, diagnoses were confirmed in 17 (42.5%) patients after BAE.Conclusions:This prospective multicenter observational study documents the efficacy of BAE in pediatric patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hagiwara, S. I., Kudo, T., Kakuta, F., Inoue, M., Yokoyama, K., Umetsu, S., … Nakayama, Y. (2019). Clinical safety and utility of pediatric balloon-Assisted enteroscopy: A multicenter prospective study in japan. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 68(3), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free