A meta-analysis of late outcomes of mitral valve repair in patients with rheumatic heart disease

27Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a predominant health concern in developing countries. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of mitral valve (MV) repair in patients with RHD, and identify predictors that may postoperatively affect treatment outcome. Methods: A meta-analysis of eligible studies assessing patients undergoing MV repair with RHD and reporting the outcomes of MV repair, including 30-day mortality and long-term follow-up survival, MV reoperation rate and postoperative adverse events. Relevant English articles were searched up to 1 March, 2017 in Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, EmBase, Elsevier, and Science Direct. Selected studies should meet all inclusion criteria, and underwent data extraction. Results: A total of ten studies with 2,770 patients met all inclusion criteria, and were selected for assessment. Pooled analysis showed that 30-day mortality in patients with rheumatic MV disease after MV repair surgery was 1.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.8-2.9%); long-term survival was 97.3%, 95% CI (95.9-98.6%), and a freedom from reoperation rate of 93.6%, 95% CI (91.4-95.9%) was obtained; freedom from adverse events was 97.5%, 95% CI (95.2-99.8%). Conclusions: The outcome of rheumatic MV repair is outstanding in terms of low early mortality, high long-term survival and freedom from valve-related complications, which may be very common in patients after rheumatic MV replacement; meanwhile, MV reoperation rate after initial surgery is acceptable. Surgeons may try to repair MV in RHD when it is feasible.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fu, J. T., Popal, M. S., Zhang, H. B., Han, W., Hu, Q. M., Meng, X., & Ma, C. Y. (2017). A meta-analysis of late outcomes of mitral valve repair in patients with rheumatic heart disease. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 9(11), 4366–4375. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.97

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free