Ultrasound or sectional imaging techniques as screening tools for hepatocellular carcinoma: Fall forward or move forward?

24Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is probably the epitome of a screening target, with a well-defined high-risk population, accessible screening methods, and multiple curative-intent treatments available for early disease. Per major societies guideline consensus, biannual ultrasound (US) surveillance of the at-risk patients is the current standard of care worldwide. Yet, despite its documented success in the past decades, this standard is far from perfect. While the whole com-munity is working to further tighten the knots, a worrying number of cases still slip through this safety net. Consequently, these patients lose their chance to a curative solution which leads to a high disease burden with disproportionate mortality. While US will probably remain the fundamental staple in the screening strategy, key questions are seeking better answers. How can its ca-veats be addressed, and the technique be improved? When are further steps needed? How to increase accuracy without giving up on accessibility? This narrative review discusses the place of US surveillance in the bigger HCC picture, trying to navigate through its strengths and limits based on the most recent available evidence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sparchez, Z., Craciun, R., Caraiani, C., Horhat, A., Nenu, I., Procopet, B., … Mocan, T. (2021, March 1). Ultrasound or sectional imaging techniques as screening tools for hepatocellular carcinoma: Fall forward or move forward? Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10050903

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free