Failures to Detect Contradictions in a Text: What Readers Believe Versus What They Read

151Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Subjects read brief paragraphs containing contradictory statements. Many of the subjects failed to notice the contradiction. On a subsequent recall test, nondetectors frequently either recalled only one or neither of the contradictory statements or explained the contradiction away. The construction-integration model of discourse comprehension is used to simulate these results. Failures to detect contradictions are accounted for by assuming that nondetectors believe too strongly in the global text interpretations they create or in their prior beliefs. In the model, this means that their comprehension processes are normal, except that one normal component of comprehension differential weighting of important statements is exaggerated. © 1992, Association for Psychological Science. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to Detect Contradictions in a Text: What Readers Believe Versus What They Read. Psychological Science, 3(4), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00034.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free