Patient flow in the emergency department: A classification and analysis of admission process policies

44Citations
Citations of this article
146Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Study objective: We investigate the effect of admission process policies on patient flow in the emergency department (ED). Methods: We surveyed an advisory panel group to determine approaches to admission process policies and classified them as admission decision is made by the team of providers (attending physicians, residents, physician extenders) (type 1) or attending physicians (type 2) on the admitting service, team of providers (type 3), or attending physicians (type 4) in the ED. We developed discrete-event simulation models of patient flow to evaluate the potential effect of the 4 basic policy types and 2 hybrid types, referred to as triage attending physician consultation and remote collaborative consultation on key performance measures. Results: Compared with the current admission process policy (type 1), the alternatives were all effective in reducing the length of stay of admitted patients by 14% to 26%. In other words, patients may spend 1.4 to 2.5 hours fewer on average in the ED before being admitted to internal medicine under a new admission process policy. The improved flow of admitted patients decreased both the ED length of stay of discharged patients and the overall length of stay by up to 5% and 6.4%, respectively. These results are framed in context of teaching mission and physician experience. Conclusion: An efficient admission process can reduce waiting times for both admitted and discharged ED patients. This study contributed to demonstrating the potential value of leveraging admission process policies and developing a framework for pursuing these policies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kang, H., Nembhard, H. B., Rafferty, C., & Deflitch, C. J. (2014). Patient flow in the emergency department: A classification and analysis of admission process policies. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 64(4), 335-342.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free