Analysis of Pioneering Computable Biomedical Knowledge Repositories and their Emerging Governance Structures

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A growing interest in producing and sharing computable biomedical knowledge artifacts (CBKs) is increasing the demand for repositories that validate, catalog, and provide shared access to CBKs. However, there is a lack of evidence on how best to manage and sustain CBK repositories. In this paper, we present the results of interviews with several pioneering CBK repository owners. These interviews were informed by the Trusted Repositories Audit and Certification (TRAC) framework. Insights gained from these interviews suggest that the organizations operating CBK repositories are somewhat new, that their initial approaches to repository governance are informal, and that achieving economic sustainability for their CBK repositories is a major challenge. To enable a learning health system to make better use of its data intelligence, future approaches to CBK repository management will require enhanced governance and closer adherence to best practice frameworks to meet the needs of myriad biomedical science and health communities. More effort is needed to find sustainable funding models for accessible CBK artifact collections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amara, P. S., Conte, M., Flynn, A., Platt, J., & Trinidad, M. G. (2022). Analysis of Pioneering Computable Biomedical Knowledge Repositories and their Emerging Governance Structures. Data Intelligence, 4(3), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00148

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free