The racial politics of Afropolitanism and Zukiswa Wanner’s London, Cape Town, Joburg

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While scholars have long taken Afropolitanism to task for its classism, its racial politics have largely been praised. Pushing against this (un)critical consensus, this article offers the first sustained analysis of the racial politics informing Achille Mbembe’s theory of Afropolitanism alongside Zukiswa Wanner’s novel London, Cape Town, Joburg (2014). Making visible how institutional racism continues to define the post-apartheid present, it shows that both authors differentially single out race for scrutiny and collude in mystifying white dominance in South Africa. Just as Mbembe’s works on Afropolitanism are preoccupied with race but obfuscate racism, Wanner’s novel uses racialized drama as an important plot device yet stigmatizes the denunciation of white supremacy, while sharply critiquing homophobia, sexism, and xenophobia. In invoking race as central while relieving white people of responsibility for the racist status quo, these works display paradoxes that reveal an investment in silencing racism, paradoxes which this article lays bare.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milazzo, M. (2024). The racial politics of Afropolitanism and Zukiswa Wanner’s London, Cape Town, Joburg. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 60(3), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2024.2342957

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free