Mixed methods framework for implementation research in the architecture, engineering, construction and operations industry

0Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The adoption of novel construction technologies, practices, and policies, despite the existence of credible and feasible research, remains a significant challenge. This issue is further compounded by the limited number of comprehensive studies on research design specifically aimed at implementation. In response to this gap, the present study seeks to develop a framework that enhances the dissemination of innovative research outputs by integrating implementation science principles within mixed research designs. The research is conducted as a systematic literature review (SLR), wherein 47 relevant sources were selected following two rounds of filtration based on the preferred reporting items for systematic meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The selected studies were categorised according to their year of publication and source, employing descriptive analysis. A subsequent thematic analysis of these sources revealed the potential applications of implementation science, including the development of frameworks, policy formulation, implementation strategies, and the analysis of framework users. The resulting framework posits that implementation domains and objectives must be considered in conjunction with factors such as research priorities, function, timing, dependencies, and integration with research methods. This study underscores the importance of designing research with a focus on implementation to enhance the effective dissemination of research findings within the construction industry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tennakoon, T. M. M. P., Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Ochoa, J. J., & Samaraweera, A. (2026). Mixed methods framework for implementation research in the architecture, engineering, construction and operations industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2515493

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free