Classic cases revisited: Of hurricanes, cyanide and moral courage

2Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

All decisions made by doctors have a moral dimension. When a moral judgement demands a different course of action to one that represents the usual practice, many doctors do struggle. The inability to embrace such decisions can represent moral negligence, as often the consequence is greater suffering for the individual in question or loss of utility for the population. On the other hand, it takes courage to make such decisions as the society fails to accept them, even though decisions made are rational and morally valid. Clinical practice that does not conform to moral judgements can result in moral distress, burn out and job-leave. Reflective practice evaluating moral dimensions of clinical decision making is an important aspect of nurturing humanity, empathy and professionalism in the therapeutic endeavour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szawarski, P. (2020). Classic cases revisited: Of hurricanes, cyanide and moral courage. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 21(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1751143718787755

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free