Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions

15Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were written with a feminist perspective? Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant US Supreme Court cases on gender from the 1800s to the present day. The twenty-five opinions in this volume demonstrate that judges with feminist viewpoints could have changed the course of the law. The rewritten decisions reveal that previously accepted judicial outcomes were not necessary or inevitable and demonstrate that feminist reasoning increases the judicial capacity for justice. Feminist Judgments opens a path for a long overdue discussion of the real impact of judicial diversity on the law as well as the influence of perspective on judging.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crawford, B. J., & Infanti, A. C. (2017). Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions (pp. 1–329). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108225007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free