Single-dose intra-articular bupivacaine plus morphine after knee arthroscopic surgery: A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled studies

10Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-dose intra-articular bupivacaine plus morphine after knee arthroscopic surgery. Design: Meta-analysis. Data sources and study eligibility criteria: A comprehensive literature search, using Medline (1966-2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase databases, was conducted to identify randomised placebo-controlled trials that used a combination of single-dose intra-articular bupivacaine and morphine for postoperative pain relief. Results: 12 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of the bupivacaine plus morphine group were significantly lower than those of the placebo group (weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.75; 95% CI -2.16 to -1.33; p<0.001). The VAS scores at the last follow-up time point (last VAS scores) of the bupivacaine plus morphine group were also significantly lower than those of the placebo group (WMD -1.46; 95% CI -1.63 to -1.29; p<0.001). The number of patients requiring supplementary analgesia was also significantly reduced (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93; p=0.02), while there was no significant difference in the time to first analgesic request (WMD 3.46; 95% CI -1.81 to 8.72; p=0.20) or short-term side effects (RR 1.67; 95% CI 0.65 to 4.26; p=0.29). Conclusions: The administration of single-dose intra-articular bupivacaine plus morphine after knee arthroscopic surgery is effective for pain relief, and its short-term side effects remain similar to saline placebo.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y. L., Zeng, C., Xie, D. X., Yang, Y., Wei, J., Yang, T., … Lei, G. H. (2015). Single-dose intra-articular bupivacaine plus morphine after knee arthroscopic surgery: A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled studies. BMJ Open, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006815

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free