Efficacy and Safety of Periprocedural Dabigatran in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

84Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Periprocedural anticoagulation using uninterrupted warfarin could reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Few studies, however, have evaluated the efficacy and safety of periprocedural dabigatran in AF ablation. Methods and Results: A total of 211 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation, including 110 patients who received 110 mg dabigatran twice daily (group D) and 101 patients who received dose-adjusted warfarin (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0; group W), were evaluated. Dabigatran was discontinued on the morning of the procedure, and resumed on the next morning. Warfarin was continued throughout the procedure. During the procedure, heparin infusion was maintained to achieve an activated clotting time of >300 s. Postprocedural cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 60 patients (group D, n=31; group W, n=29). No periprocedural deaths or symptomatic thromboembolic complications were observed in either group. MRI indicated a silent cerebral infarction in 1 patient in each group. Five patients in group D and 11 in group W had minor bleeding (P=0.12). Cardiac tamponade occurred in 2 patients in group W, but in none in group D. Total bleeding complications occurred less frequently in group D (4.5%) than in group W (12.9%; P<0.05). Conclusions: Dabigatran at a dose of 110 mg twice daily was safe for AF ablation in patients with a relatively low risk of thromboemboli, suggesting that it may become an alternative to warfarin in those patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaseno, K., Naito, S., Nakamura, K., Sakamoto, T., Sasaki, T., Tsukada, N., … Tada, H. (2012). Efficacy and Safety of Periprocedural Dabigatran in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation Journal, 76(10), 2337–2342. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0498

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free