Abstract
Reciprocity is central to our understanding of politics. Most political exchanges - whether they involve legislative vote trading, interbranch bargaining, constituent service, or even the corrupt exchange of public resources for private wealth - require reciprocity. But how does reciprocity arise? Do government officials learn reciprocity while holding office, or do recruitment and selection practices favor those who already adhere to a norm of reciprocity? We recruit Zambian politicians who narrowly won or lost a previous election to play behavioral games that provide a measure of reciprocity. This combination of regression discontinuity and experimental designs allows us to estimate the effect of holding office on behavior. We find that holding office increases adherence to the norm of reciprocity. This study identifies causal effects of holding office on politicians' behavior.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Enemark, D., Gibson, C. C., McCubbins, M. D., & Seim, B. (2016). Effect of holding office on the behavior of politicians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(48), 13690–13695. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511501113
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.