Psychiatric disorders in inpatients on a neurology ward: Estimate of prevalence and usefulness of screening questionnaires

30Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Patients on neurology wards have been shown to have high rates of psychiatric illness. Prevalence figures of 39-64% have been reported previously. However a low rate of recognition of psychiatric illness is also observed in this population. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of psychiatric illness in neurology inpatients in a regional neuroscience centre and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a batch of screening questionnaires. Method: Patients were assessed using the following screening questionnaires: Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders, Mini Mental State Examination, Frontal Assessment Battery, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and a neurologist-rating scale of organicity. All patients also had a full psychiatric assessment using the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV). The screening questionnaires were then compared with our "gold standard", the psychiatric assessment. Results: The prevalence of psychiatric illness (as determined by the psychiatric interview) in neurology inpatients in a tertiary referral centre was found to be 51.3% (95% confidence interval 44 to 58%). The sensitivity of this batch of screening questionnaires is 81.2% and the specificity is 77.1%. Conclusion: A high prevalence of psychiatric disorder was observed in inpatients on a dedicated neurology ward. The screening questionnaires used had a high sensitivity and specificity and could therefore be used as a simple way of identifying those with psychiatric illness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jefferies, K., Owino, A., Rickards, H., & Agrawal, N. (2007). Psychiatric disorders in inpatients on a neurology ward: Estimate of prevalence and usefulness of screening questionnaires. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 78(4), 414–416. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.103044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free