Comparison between FEBio and Abaqus for biphasic contact problems

18Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Articular cartilage plays an important role in the function of diarthrodial joints. Computational methods have been used to study the biphasic mechanics of cartilage, and Abaqus has been one of the most widely used commercial software packages for this purpose. A newly developed open-source finite element solver, FEBio, has been developed specifically for biomechanical applications. The aim of this study was to undertake a direct comparison between FEBio and Abaqus for some practical contact problems involving cartilage. Three model types, representing a porous flat-ended indentation test, a spherical-ended indentation test, and a conceptual natural joint contact model, were compared. In addition, a parameter sensitivity study was also performed for the spherical-ended indentation test to investigate the effects of changes in the input material properties on the model outputs, using both FEBio and Abaqus. Excellent agreement was found between FEBio and Abaqus for all of the model types and across the range of material properties that were investigated. © IMechE 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meng, Q., Jin, Z., Fisher, J., & Wilcox, R. (2013). Comparison between FEBio and Abaqus for biphasic contact problems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 227(9), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411913483537

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free