Accuracy of Dietary Reference Intakes for determining energy requirements in girls

6Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The most recent Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) (2002) for energy were based on pooled data from convenience samples of individuals with energy expenditure determined by using doubly labeled water (DLW). To our knowledge, the accuracy of these intake estimates has not been assessed in children. Objective: We assessed the accuracy of DRI prediction equations for determining daily energy needs in girls by comparing the individual- level prediction of estimated energy requirements with the measured value of total energy expenditure (TEE) from DLW, which is considered the gold standard. Design: In this cross-sectional analysis, we measured the resting metabolic rate (RMR) by using indirect calorimetry and TEE by using DLW in 161 nonobese premenarcheal girls aged 8-12 y. The activity factor TEE/RMR was used to categorize the physical activity level used in DRI equations. Results: We observed a strong linear relation between TEE by using DLW and estimated energy requirements predicted from DRI equations (Pearson's r = 0.78, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0. 61). The DRI-predicted energy requirements underestimated measured TEE by ~120 kcal on average. The overall mean (±SD) error in the sample was -121.3 ± 163.9 kcal. The average (±SD) percentage error in the sample was 25.8 ± 7.9%. Seventy percent of participants had predicted TEE values ≤10% of measured TEE. Conclusions: DRI equations for girls predict well for the group. The use of these equations for individuals may result in the underestimation of energy requirements for a significant percentage of girls. © 2013 American Society for Nutrition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bandini, L. G., Lividini, K., Phillips, S. M., & Must, A. (2013). Accuracy of Dietary Reference Intakes for determining energy requirements in girls. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98(3), 700–704. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.052233

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free