Exploring professional coach educators’ realities, challenges and workplace relationships

12Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite scholarly interest in formal coach education, there is a paucity of research with professional coach educators (tutors). To date, and despite their crucial role in certifying and developing coaches, their perspectives have lacked consideration and/or have been limited to empirical enquiry in a specific team sport. Therefore, the aim of this research was to explore the realities, challenges, and workplace relationships of 16 coach educators from different sports in the United Kingdom (UK). Semi-structured interviews were used to gain insights into their experiences and workplaces and the data were analysed thematically through inductive and deductive processes. The sociological framework of Bourdieu was adopted to provide an advanced analysis, drawing on the under-utilised concept of illusio in particular. The analyses showed that coach educators’ roles and realities were typically pressurised, challenging and repetitive. Their experiences were generally, however, contrasting depending on the sport and size of the sporting governing body (SGB). Notwithstanding, each participant exercised compliance in the workplace and performed their roles unquestioningly as they appropriated their SGBs’ methods. The findings highlight the need for further examination and critical inquiry with coach educators, coach developers, senior SGB employees, policymakers and stakeholders to shed light and facilitate greater understanding of coach educators’ realities, challenges, relationships and practice within formal coach education cultures. Only by understanding these environments from all perspectives can experiences, policy and practice be enhanced.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watts, D. W., Cushion, C., & Cale, L. (2023). Exploring professional coach educators’ realities, challenges and workplace relationships. Sport, Education and Society, 28(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.2019696

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free