How to beat science and influence people: Policymakers and propaganda in epistemic networks

59Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In their recent book, Oreskes and Conway ([2010]) describe the 'tobacco strategy', which was used by the tobacco industry to influence policymakers regarding the health risks of tobacco products. The strategy involved two parts, consisting of (i) promoting and sharing independent research supporting the industry's preferred position and (ii) funding additional research, but selectively publishing the results. We introduce a model of the tobacco strategy, and use it to argue that both prongs of the strategy can be extremely effective - even when policymakers rationally update on all evidence available to them. As we elaborate, this model helps illustrate the conditions under which the tobacco strategy is particularly successful. In addition, we show how journalists engaged in 'fair' reporting can inadvertently mimic the effects of industry on public belief.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weatherall, J. O., O’Connor, C., & Bruner, J. P. (2020). How to beat science and influence people: Policymakers and propaganda in epistemic networks. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(4), 1157–1186. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free