Molecular interaction studies of green tea catechins as multitarget drug candidates for the treatment of Parkinsons disease: Computational and structural insights

32Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Green tea catechins have extensively been studied for their imminent role in reducing the risk of various neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinsons disease (PD). Understanding the molecular interaction of these compounds with various anti-Parkinsonian drug targets is of interest. The present study is intended to explore binding modes of catechins with molecular targets having potential role in PD. Lamarckian genetic algorithm methodology was adopted for molecular docking simulations employing AutoDock 4.2 program. Toxicity potential and molecular properties responsible for good pharmacokinetic profile were calculated by Osiris property explorer and Molinspiration online toolkit, respectively. A strong correlation coefficient (r2 = 0.893) was obtained between experimentally reported and docking predicted activities of native co-crystallized ligands of the 18 target receptors used in current study. Analysis of docked conformations revealed monoamine oxidase-B as most promising, while N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor was recognized as the least favorable target for catechins. Benzopyran skeleton with a phenyl group substituted at the 2-position and a hydroxyl (or ester) function at the 3-position has been identified as common structural requirements at majority of the targets. The present findings suggest that epigallocatechin gallate is the most promising lead to be developed as multitarget drug for the design and development of novel anti-Parkinsonian agents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azam, F., Mohamed, N., & Alhussen, F. (2015). Molecular interaction studies of green tea catechins as multitarget drug candidates for the treatment of Parkinsons disease: Computational and structural insights. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 26(3–4), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.3109/0954898X.2016.1146416

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free