Technical note: A new high-performance liquid chromatography purine assay for quantifying microbial flow

18Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An HPLC method was developed to quantify the purines adenine and guanine and their metabolites xanthine and hypoxanthine in hydrolysates of isolated bacteria and omasal digesta and to assess the effect of using either purines only or purines plus metabolites as microbial markers for estimating microbial now from the rumen. Individual purines and their metabolites were completely resolved on a C18 column using gradient elution with 2 mobile phases. Intraassay coefficient of variation ranged from 0.6 to 3.1%. Hydrolytic recovery of the 4 purine bases from their corresponding nucleosides averaged 101% (control), 103% (when added to bacterial isolates), and 104% (when added to omasal digesta). Mean concentrations of adenine, guanine, xanthine, and hypoxanthine were, respectively, 53, 58, 2.8, and 3.5 μmol/g of dry matter in omasal bacteria and 10, 12, 7.5, and 7.5 μmol/g of dry matter in omasal digesta, indicating that xanthine plus hypoxanthine represented 5% of total purines in bacterial hydrolysates but 41% of total purines in digesta hydrolysates. A significant negative relationship (R2 = 0.53) between the sum of adenine and guanine and the sum of xanthine and hypoxanthine in digesta samples (but not bacterial isolates) indicated that 89% of the adenine and guanine originally present in ruminai microbes were recovered as xanthine and hypoxanthine. These results suggested that, when total purines are used as the microbial marker, both purines and their metabolites should be quantified and used to compute microbial nonammonia N and organic matter flows. © American Dairy Science Association, 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reynal, S. M., & Broderick, G. A. (2009). Technical note: A new high-performance liquid chromatography purine assay for quantifying microbial flow. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(3), 1177–1181. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1479

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free