Predictors of Cultural Intelligence: Automated Machine Learning vs. PLS-SEM

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study applies a dual-method analytical approach combining Automated Machine Learning (AML) and PLS-SEM to investigate the predictors of Cultural Intelligence (CQ), one of the most commonly used constructs in international business (IB) research. Our research seeks to (1) explore a wide range of potential CQ predictors, and (2) demonstrate how AML and PLS-SEM methodologies can complement each other in IB research. Using a large international sample of 58,784 participants from 160 countries, we find that while international experience and personality traits predict CQ as expected, English language proficiency and emotional intelligence also emerge as significant predictors. The methodological comparison confirms that AML excels in exploratory pattern detection and handling complex datasets, while PLS-SEM enables theory testing and structural validation. The integration of both methods yields richer insights than either method alone. Implications for practice and research are discussed, and guidelines for using AML and PLS-SEM in IB research are provided.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taras, V., Rickley, M., Alon, I., Dong, L., & Malmin, H. (2025). Predictors of Cultural Intelligence: Automated Machine Learning vs. PLS-SEM. Journal of International Management, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101290

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free