International society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens: Rationale and organization

60Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference in Boston, made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. The activities of the conference were coordinated through five workgroups. The results are presented in five separate reports covering (1) specimen handling, (2) T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume, (3) extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease, (4) seminal vesicles and lymph node metastases and (5) surgical margins. In this introductory article we describe some novel features of the organization of the consensus process. Following the completion of a pre-meeting survey conference, participants discussed and voted on 43 specific issues of contention relating to the pathological reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Consensus, defined as agreement by at least 65% of participants present, was achieved for 30 questions. © 2011 USCAP, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Egevad, L., Srigley, J. R., & Delahunt, B. (2011). International society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens: Rationale and organization. Modern Pathology. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free