Self-care autonomy and outcomes of intensive therapy or usual care in youth with type 1 diabetes

29Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: This article evaluated whether deviation from developmentally appropriate self-care autonomy moderated the effects of intensive therapy (IT) or usual care (UC) on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) in 142 youths with diabetes. Methods: Youths received an autonomy/maturity ratio (AMR) score at baseline that was a ratio of standardized scores on measures of self-care autonomy to standardized scores on measures of psychological maturity and were categorized by tertile split into low, moderate, and high AMR. Results: Higher baseline AMR was associated with higher baseline HbA1C for IT and UC. Baseline AMR scores predicted glycemic outcomes from UC; the high AMR tertile showed deteriorating glycemic control over time, whereas the low AMR tertile maintained better glycemic control. All three AMR groups derived equal glycemic benefit from IT. Conclusion: Children with inordinate diabetes self-care autonomy may fare poorly in UC but these same children may realize less glycemic deterioration during IT. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wysocki, T., Harris, M. A., Buckloh, L. M., Wilkinson, K., Sadler, M., Mauras, N., & White, N. H. (2006). Self-care autonomy and outcomes of intensive therapy or usual care in youth with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31(10), 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsj017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free