Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) and Jigsaw: Which is More Effective on EFL Reading

  • Arisman R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this research was to find out the significant difference of two learning method from cooperative learning; those are Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) and Jigsaw method and which method is more effective in EFL reading comprehension. This research used a quantitative approach by applying a quasi-experimental method. The data were collected from two classes at grade eight students of SMP Negeri 3 Baubau, Southeast Sulawesi in the school year of 2018/2019 using test. The test was applied twice; those were pretest and posttest for each class. The results indicated that there was not any significant difference in EFL reading comprehension between CIRC and Jigsaw group. But, the range between pretest and posttest for each class indicated the Jigsaw method was more effective than the CIRC group since the mean score of EFL reading comprehension in Jigsaw group was greater than the CIRC group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arisman, R. (2019). Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) and Jigsaw: Which is More Effective on EFL Reading. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i3.1597

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free