Comparison of the allergenic potency of house dust extract and house dust mite allergen extract for subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) with non-standardized house dust (HD) extracts has been used in Japan since 1963 for house dust mite (HDM)-allergic patients. Since the potencies of HD extracts are unknown, the allergenic potency of HD extracts was examined by comparing with a standardized HDM allergen extracts. The major allergen content of HDM in the extracts was measured using a sandwich enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The immunoglobulin E (IgE) inhibitory activities of the extracts were measured by a competitive ELISA. The extract concentrations giving 50% inhibition of IgE binding (log10 IC 50) were determined from dose response curves and defined as inhibitory activities. A linear regression line was constructed from the log10 IC50 values of the standardized HDM extract to interpolate the relative potency of the HD extract with strength of 1 : 10 w/v (HD 1 : 10). The amounts of major allergens (Der f 1, Der p 1 and Der 2) were 116.3μg/mL in the HDM allergen extract (100000 Japanese Allergy Units [JAU]/mL) and 0.77μg/mL in the HD 1 : 10. The inhibitory activity (log10 IC50 values) of HD 1 : 10 was 2.389±0.078, indicating the allergenic potency was between 200 and 2000 JAU/mL. Based on regression analysis (R2 >0.99), the allergenic potency of HD 1 : 10 was estimated to be 842±128 JAU/mL. The present study determined the major allergen content of HD extract, which contributes to its allergenic potency. The allergenic potency of HD 1 : 10 was ca. 100-fold less than that of HDM allergen extract.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Du, W., Fukano, C., Yonemoto, M., Matsuoka, T., Masuyama, K., & Ohashi-Doi, K. (2019). Comparison of the allergenic potency of house dust extract and house dust mite allergen extract for subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 42(4), 601–606. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b18-00710

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free