Prospective Comparison of 64Copper [64Cu]SAR-bisPSMA vs 68Gallium[68Ga] PSMA-11 PET/CT for Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy (Co-PSMA Trial)

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and objective Prostate-specific membrane-antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has transformed management of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR) with higher diagnostic accuracy than previous imaging modalities. 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA PET/computed tomography (CT) (64Cu-bisPSMA) is a bivalent-PSMA-peptide with 12.7-hr half-life. The study objective was detection rate (per-patient) comparison between 64Cu-bisPSMA and 68GaPSMA-11 PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA) in BCR post radical prostatectomy (RP) (NCT06907641). Methods This prospective imaging trial enrolled 50 participants with BCR (PSA 0.2–0.75 ng/ml). 64Cu-bisPSMA (1 and 24 hr) and 68Ga-PSMA were acquired within 3-wk. Images were prospectively reported, and triple read for concordance. Management impact was evaluated after 68Ga-PSMA and 64Cu-bisPSMA. A reference standard (RS) for accuracy included biopsy, targeted treatment response (no androgen deprivation therapy), PSA increase/decrease on observation or repeat imaging (64Cu-bisPSMA). The primary endpoint was mean per-participant lesional difference. Paired t tests and mixed-effects Poisson regression assessed lesion number differences between scans. Key findings and limitations Median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 0.43 (interquartile range: 0.31–0.63). Mean per-participant lesions were higher in 64Cu-bisPSMA (1.26) versus 68GaPSMA (0.48), difference 0.78 (95% CI: 0.52–1.04), ratio 2.63 (95% CI: 1.64–4.20) ( p < 0.0001). At a per-participant level 78% (39/50) were positive on 24-hr 64Cu-bisPSMA compared to 36% (18/50) on 68GaPSMA. Management changed between scans in 22/50 (44%). 64Cu-bisPSMA were triple concordant in 84% (42/50) and 68Ga-PSMA reads in 80% (40/50). RS-true positive was 71% (24/34) versus 29% (10/34) and RS-false negative rate was 21% (7/34) versus 65% (22/34) for 64Cu-bisPSMA versus 68Ga-PSMA, respectively. Conclusion and clinical implications 64Cu-bisPSMA-PET/CT identifies a higher number of disease recurrences than 68Ga PSMA-PET/CT with substantial management impact and a high RS true positive rate in men with BCR post RP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khan, S., Papa, N., Kneebone, A., Eade, T., Ayati, N., Nguyen, A., … Emmett, L. (2026). Prospective Comparison of 64Copper [64Cu]SAR-bisPSMA vs 68Gallium[68Ga] PSMA-11 PET/CT for Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy (Co-PSMA Trial). European Urology, 89(6), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2026.03.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free