Beauty is not all there is to aesthetics in mathematics

11Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aesthetics in philosophy of mathematics is too narrowly construed. Beauty is not the only feature in mathematics that is arguably aesthetic. While not the highest aesthetic value, being interesting is a sine qua non for publishability. Of the many ways to be interesting, being explanatory has recently been discussed. The motivational power of what is interesting is important for both directing research and stimulating education. The scientific satisfaction of curiosity and the artistic desire for beautiful results are complementary but both aesthetic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, R. S. D. (2017). Beauty is not all there is to aesthetics in mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica, 25(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkw019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free