Defining a Central Monitoring Capability: Sharing the Experience of TransCelerate BioPharma’s Approach, Part 2

14Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: TransCelerate’s model approach to risk-based monitoring (RBM) includes the application of the appropriate monitoring activities to enable both the early detection and timely resolution of issues. This article is a follow-up to part 1, published in the September 2014 issue with the same title. Methods: The intent of this paper is to share information on what has been learned by various companies’ applications of central monitoring activities based on different RBM operating models. A library of risk indicators has been created, and this paper provides additional guidance on what has been learned in the application of these tools. Results: The goal is to share the needs related to people, process, and technology as experienced by TransCelerate member companies. Conclusions: One of the primary issue detection methods of central monitoring is the proactive identification of areas of focus through the use of risk indicators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gough, J., Wilson, B., Zerola, M., Wallis, P., Mork, L., Knepper, D., & Achenbach, H. (2016). Defining a Central Monitoring Capability: Sharing the Experience of TransCelerate BioPharma’s Approach, Part 2. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, 50(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479015618696

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free