Abstract
We wanted to show the different group dynamics of factors for success and failure cases for technology commercialization in small technology-based firms. Existing studies are based on product level, project level, division level or firm level. We deal with technology level, and at small-technology-based firms. This is a longitudinal case study based on 8 cases from Korea. Our study on technology level is a first trial in success and failure studies unlike all existing studies. As a first step, we introduced new categories and factors such as technology attributes and CEO reflecting data, and especially a new concept of launch readiness level. Finally, we adopted correspondence analysis to show the group dynamics. The results are as follows; Technology factors are the most important factors. Second, resource-based factors are more critical in failure cases than success cases and technology factors are more critical to success.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kim, C.-H., & Ko, C.-R. (2014). Success and Failure Factors of Technology Commercialization: A Korean Case. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 3(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2014.3.1.025
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.