Importance of continuity of care from a patient perspective–a cross-sectional study in Swedish health care

6Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the patients’ view on continuity of care (CoC), including preference for a certain general practitioner (GP) and importance and access to a regular general practitioner (RGP). Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Primary care center in Halland County, in the western part of Sweden. Subjects: Patients ≥18 years old and having at least one appointment at the primary care center during October–December 2022. Main outcome measures: Preference for a certain GP and importance of and accessibility for an RGP. Results: The study included 404 patients. Importance of having an RGP was considered by 86% of the patients. Preference for a certain GP was thought by 73% of the patients, and when asked as a bivariate question, 69% considered having an RGP. Both the importance of an RGP and preference for a certain GP were more often considered by patients ≥65 years (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, E., & Lindman, I. (2024). Importance of continuity of care from a patient perspective–a cross-sectional study in Swedish health care. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 42(1), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2023.2299119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free