Reregulating for Freshwater Enclosure: A State of Exception in Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand

18Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that democracy is increasingly indistinguishable from authoritarianism, in a process that is entangled with neoliberalisms. To build this argument, we examine a case study of central government intervention in regional environmental decision making in Aotearoa New Zealand through the lens of Agamben's "state of exception". The intervention-unprecedented and unconstitutional-squeezed democratic spaces for decision making about freshwater and sought to smooth the way for capital accumulation. The audacity of government actions indicate, we argue, an abandonment of efforts to disguise neoliberal encroachments on democracy, known as the double truth tactic. Yet we also argue that in identifying this as a state of exception, we can examine it as part of a process and therefore demonstrate the possibilities for counter-hegemonic actions to emerge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, A. C., & Bond, S. (2016). Reregulating for Freshwater Enclosure: A State of Exception in Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand. Antipode, 48(3), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free