Calcium aluminate coated and uncoated free form fabricated cocr implants: A comparative study in rabbit

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the integration in bone of uncoated free form fabricated cobalt chromium (CoCr) implants to the same implant with a calcium aluminate coating. The implants of cylindrical design with a pyramidal surface structure were press-fit into the limbs of New Zealand white rabbits. After 6 weeks, the rabbits were sacrificed, and samples were retrieved and embedded. Ground sections were subjected to histological analysis and histomorphometry. The section counter part was used for preparing an electron transparent transmission electron microscopy sample by focused ion beam milling. Calcium aluminate dip coating provided a significantly greater degree of bone contact than that of the native CoCr. The gibbsite hydrate formed in the hardening reaction of the calcium aluminate was found to be the exclusive crystalline phase material in direct contact with bone. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palmquist, A., Jarmar, T., Hermansson, L., Emanuelsson, L., Taylor, A., Taylor, M., … Thomsen, P. (2009). Calcium aluminate coated and uncoated free form fabricated cocr implants: A comparative study in rabbit. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 91(1), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31380

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free