Analytical performance of the RIDASCREEN® Hantavirus puumala IgG/IgM ELISA assay

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The National Reference Center for Hantavirus in Belgium is currently using the Hantavirus IgM/IgG ELISA Progen kit (Heidelberg, Germany) for the detection of the most prevalent Hantavirus in Western Europe, Puumala virus (PUUV). Two commercially available PUUV kits were compared: Progen and RIDASCREEN® Hantavirus Puumala IgM/IgG ELISA assay (Darmstadt, Germany). Methods: The sensitivity was evaluated with a panel of 68 samples from patients with an acute infection (n = 44) or a past infection (n = 24). Specificity was evaluated with a panel of 62 samples from patients with potentially false borderline results (n = 7) (no seroconversion), seronegative samples (n = 25) and potentially cross reacting samples (n = 30). Discordances were resolved by immunoblot. Substantial agreement was calculated using Cohen kappa coefficient. Results: The RIDASCREEN® kit showed a higher specificity (IgM: 94.3%; IgG: 94.4%) than the Progen kit (IgM: 77.0% IgG: 93.0%). The sensitivity for IgM ELISA was 100% for both assays. IgG sensitivity was, respectively, 98.3% and 100% for Progen and RIDASCREEN®. A Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.76 and 0.90 was found between Puumala IgM and IgG, respectively. Conclusions: This study showed a higher specificity for the RIDASCREEN® kit than the Progen kit, while the sensitivity was as good as for the Progen kit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Depypere, M., Lagrou, K., van Esbroeck, M., Houben, E., & van Ranst, M. (2020). Analytical performance of the RIDASCREEN® Hantavirus puumala IgG/IgM ELISA assay. Viruses, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/v12020226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free