Key principles for a national clinical decision support knowledge sharing framework: Synthesis of insights from leading subject matter experts

26Citations
Citations of this article
106Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To identify key principles for establishing a national clinical decision support (CDS) knowledge sharing framework. Materials and methods: As part of an initiative by the US Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) to establish a framework for national CDS knowledge sharing, key stakeholders were identified. Stakeholders' viewpoints were obtained through surveys and in-depth interviews, and findings and relevant insights were summarized. Based on these insights, key principles were formulated for establishing a national CDS knowledge sharing framework. Results: Nineteen key stakeholders were recruited, including six executives from electronic health record system vendors, seven executives from knowledge content producers, three executives from healthcare provider organizations, and three additional experts in clinical informatics. Based on these stakeholders' insights, five key principles were identified for effectively sharing CDS knowledge nationally. These principles are (1) prioritize and support the creation and maintenance of a national CDS knowledge sharing framework; (2) facilitate the development of high-value content and tooling, preferably in an open-source manner; (3) accelerate the development or licensing of required, pragmatic standards; (4) acknowledge and address medicolegal liability concerns; and (5) establish a self-sustaining business model. Discussion: Based on the principles identified, a roadmap for national CDS knowledge sharing was developed through the ONC's Advancing CDS initiative. Conclusion: The study findings may serve as a useful guide for ongoing activities by the ONC and others to establish a national framework for sharing CDS knowledge and improving clinical care.

References Powered by Scopus

Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness

13295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: A systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success

2038Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Protocol-Based Computer Reminders, the Quality of Care and the Non-Perfectibility of Man

579Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

FHIRChain: Applying Blockchain to Securely and Scalably Share Clinical Data

572Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: A methodological review

307Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical decision support models and frameworks: Seeking to address research issues underlying implementation successes and failures

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kawamoto, K., Hongsermeier, T., Wright, A., Lewis, J., Bell, D. S., & Middleton, B. (2013). Key principles for a national clinical decision support knowledge sharing framework: Synthesis of insights from leading subject matter experts. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(1), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000887

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 44

58%

Researcher 18

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 38

51%

Computer Science 22

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 10

13%

Social Sciences 5

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free