The Next Frontier of Cybercrime Law for Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is spreading rapidly in society, but criminal law still mainly deals with human actions. This research looks at how AI systems challenge basic ideas in criminal law, such as intention (mens rea), action (actus reus), and causation. Unlike humans, AI can act on its own, learn from data, and sometimes cause harm without direct human control. Current laws are not fully able to handle situations where AI creates or helps in criminal acts. By studying recent cases, proposed laws, and legal theories, this research shows major gaps in existing rules. It argues that new legal frameworks are needed to deal with different levels of AI independence. Suggested solutions include shared responsibility models, stronger corporate liability, and clear rules for AI design and use. These ideas are important not only for cybercrime but also for areas like self-driving cars, medical AI, and automated decision-making