The fold test as an analytical tool

Abstract

Two fold tests for paleomagnetism have recently been proposed that rely on the assumption that the total population of magnetic vectors is most highly concentrated with the rocks in the orientation they had at the time of acquisition of the magnetization. This leads to appealing, simple tests based on parameter estimation. However, it is shown that the underlying assumption is flawed and can lead to incorrect conclusions. McFadden and Jones (1981) previously developed an inference test based on the concept that the between-group dispersion of magnetization should be consistent with the within-group dispersion when the rocks are in the orientation they had at the time of magnetic acquisition. That test made unrealistic demands upon the sampling scheme for typical, realistic folding geometries and so it has been under-utilized. The McFadden and Jones test is extended by recognizing that it is sufficient to use groups with similar bedding corrections and that it is not necessary to insist on groups with common bedding corrections. These groups may easily be determined with a clustering algorithm. The point is that with the rocks in the orientation at which the magnetization was acquired, it should be immaterial how the groups are chosen.