Abstract
Objective: To investigate the importance of the type of dry fly (artificial floating fly) in catching trout (brown and rainbow) in an English chalkstream. Setting: River Kennet, Berkshire. Design: Five anglers on five separate occasions spent five hours using a randomly allocated fly from a sample of five types. Participants: Five anglers of considerable but varying experience, determination, and opinion. Main outcome measures: Number, weight, and species of trout caught. Results: One fly (Black Gnat) performed significantly worse than the others. The fly most successful in catching brown trout was the Cinnamon Sedge. Conclusion: The possible prolongation of doctors' leisure time consequent on the use of unproductive trout flies has resource implications for the NHS. Urgent funding of a definitive, large multiriver trial is needed. © 1998, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Britton, B. J., Evans, J. G., & Potter, J. M. (1998). Does the fly matter? The CRACKPOT study in evidence based trout fishing. BMJ, 317(7174), 1678–1680. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7174.1678
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.