Does the fly matter? The CRACKPOT study in evidence based trout fishing

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the importance of the type of dry fly (artificial floating fly) in catching trout (brown and rainbow) in an English chalkstream. Setting: River Kennet, Berkshire. Design: Five anglers on five separate occasions spent five hours using a randomly allocated fly from a sample of five types. Participants: Five anglers of considerable but varying experience, determination, and opinion. Main outcome measures: Number, weight, and species of trout caught. Results: One fly (Black Gnat) performed significantly worse than the others. The fly most successful in catching brown trout was the Cinnamon Sedge. Conclusion: The possible prolongation of doctors' leisure time consequent on the use of unproductive trout flies has resource implications for the NHS. Urgent funding of a definitive, large multiriver trial is needed. © 1998, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Britton, B. J., Evans, J. G., & Potter, J. M. (1998). Does the fly matter? The CRACKPOT study in evidence based trout fishing. BMJ, 317(7174), 1678–1680. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7174.1678

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free