Assessment of stress coupling among the inter-, co-and post-seismic phases related to the 2004 M6 parkfield earthquake

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Due to large uncertainties and non-uniqueness in fault slip inversion, the investigation of stress coupling based on the direct comparison of independent slip inversions, for example, between the coseismic slip distribution and the interseismic slip deficit, may lead to ambiguous conclusions. In this study, we therefore adopt the stress-constrained joint inversion in the Bayesian approach of Wang et al., and implement the physical hypothesis of stress coupling as a prior. We test the hypothesis that interseismic locking is coupled with the coseismic rupture, and the early post-seismic deformation is a stress relaxation process in response to the coseismic stress perturbation. We characterize the role of stress coupling in the seismic cycle by evaluating the efficiency of the model to explain the available data. Taking the 2004 M6 Parkfield earthquake as a study case, we find that the stress coupling hypothesis is in agreement with the data. The coseismic rupture zone is found to be strongly locked during the interseismic phase and the post-seismic slip zone is indicated to be weakly creeping. The post-seismic deformation plays an important role to rebuild stress in the coseismic rupture zone. Based on our results for the stress accumulation during both inter-and post-seismic phase in the coseismic rupture zone, together with the coseismic stress drop, we estimate a recurrence time of M6 earthquake in Parkfield around 23-41 yr, suggesting that the duration of 38 yr between the two recent M6 events in Parkfield is not a surprise. © The Authors 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, L., Hainzl, S., & Zöller, G. (2014). Assessment of stress coupling among the inter-, co-and post-seismic phases related to the 2004 M6 parkfield earthquake. Geophysical Journal International, 197(3), 1858–1868. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free