Complexity of Safety and coSafety Fragments of Linear Temporal Logic

13Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) is the de-facto standard temporal logic for system specification, whose foundational properties have been studied for over five decades. Safety and cosafety properties define notable fragments of LTL, where a prefix of a trace suffices to establish whether a formula is true or not over that trace. In this paper, we study the complexity of the problems of satisfiability, validity, and realizability over infinite and finite traces for the safety and cosafety fragments of LTL. As for satisfiability and validity over infinite traces, we prove that the majority of the fragments have the same complexity as full LTL, that is, they are PSPACE-complete. The picture is radically different for realizability: we find fragments with the same expressive power whose complexity varies from 2EXPTIME-complete (as full LTL) to EXPTIME-complete. Notably, for all cosafety fragments, the complexity of the three problems does not change passing from infinite to finite traces, while for all safety fragments the complexity of satisfiability (resp., realizability) over finite traces drops to NP-complete (resp., ΠP2 -complete).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Artale, A., Geatti, L., Gigante, N., Mazzullo, A., & Montanari, A. (2023). Complexity of Safety and coSafety Fragments of Linear Temporal Logic. In Proceedings of the 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2023 (Vol. 37, pp. 6236–6244). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25768

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free