Loss of phosphorus by runoff from soils after amendment with poultry litter co-composted with crop waste

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to assess the influence of poultry litter (PL) after co-composting with sugarcane and cabbage waste on phosphorus (P) losses in runoff from soils under natural rainfall conditions. Methods: Co-composted PL was amended in silt loam and sandy clay soils. The soil applied with PL without agro-waste was considered as control treatment. Before the soil application, PL was co-composted with agro-wastes, i.e., sugarcane waste and cabbage waste at four levels (0, 25, 33, and 50%). Soils were packed in wooden trays layered with plastic. The surface soil was mixed with the co-composted PL at rates 200 and 400 kg P ha−1. Runoff samples were collected from the sloped trays during two rainfall events and P concentration was determined. Results: Phosphorus concentration was found higher in the runoff in the PL treatment without agro-waste. Poultry litter application along with agro-waste profoundly lowered P losses in the runoff as compared to the control especially at higher application of agro-waste. Application of PL composted with higher level of agro-waste (%) reduced the P losses from soils. Phosphorus losses in the runoff enhanced with higher amount of PL application depending on the soil type and initial P content in the soil. Silt loam soil amended with co-composted poultry litter/agro-waste reduced P losses more significantly as compared to sandy clay soil. Conclusion: The application of manure amendments with agro-wastes decreased the losses of soluble P and would reduce detrimental environmental effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saleem, A., Irshad, M., Ping, A., & Haroon, B. (2018). Loss of phosphorus by runoff from soils after amendment with poultry litter co-composted with crop waste. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 7(3), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-018-0207-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free