A review for clinical outcomes research: Hypothesis generation, data strategy, and hypothesis-driven statistical analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, more and more large, population-level databases have become available for clinical research. The size and complexity of these databases often present a methodological challenge for investigators. We propose that a "protocol" may facilitate the research process using these databases. In addition, much like the structured History and Physical (H&P) helps the audience appreciate the details of a patient case more systematically, a formal outcomes research protocol can also help in the systematic evaluation of an outcomes research manuscript. © 2011 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, D. C., & Talamini, M. A. (2011). A review for clinical outcomes research: Hypothesis generation, data strategy, and hypothesis-driven statistical analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 25(7), 2254–2260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1543-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free