Efectividad de la administración oral versus intramuscular de vitamina B12 en pacientes con deficiencia: Revisión sistemática

0Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vitamin B12 or cobalamin deficiency is a very common condition and is one of the most important causes of anemia. It can be treated with oral or intramuscular treatment. A summary of the evidence will be made through a systematic review of randomized clinical trials that have compared both treatments for the management of these patients. The objective of this review was to determine whether there is scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of oral versus intramuscular vitamin B12 treatment of its deficiency. The search strategy included randomized clinical trials (RCTs); databases used were: Medline, Cochrane Central, Lilacs and CINAHL. Also an electronic search in Google Scholar was performed. The results were three articles that met our eligibility criteria. We conclude that there is moderate evidence that the administration of oral vitamin B12 is most effective in the medium term increment serum cobalamin volume in patients with vitamin B12 deficiency.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Araya Quintanilla, F., Arias S., H., Hernández, M., Inostroza, Ú., & Urzúa, M. J. (2016, June 1). Efectividad de la administración oral versus intramuscular de vitamina B12 en pacientes con deficiencia: Revisión sistemática. Revista Chilena de Nutricion. Sociedad Chilena de Nutricion Bromatologia y Toxilogica. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182016000200011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free