Alternative imaginings of regulation: An experiment in co-production

6Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Despite decades of regulatory scholarship that took responsive regulation and regulatory space as starting points, much regulatory practice still has little focus on the experiences of those at the ‘sharp end’ of regulation. This article develops some of the insights from a five-year research programme that aimed to explore what regulatory systems might look like if they took seriously the idea of ‘regulating for engagement’, working with community organizations to understand how regulation is experienced ‘at the margins’. We argue that the methodology of co-production expands our ways of knowing by allowing in expertise-by-experience to the deliberative processes of regulation; the creative processes that artists bring in can produce artefacts that have an important role in developing ‘really responsive regulation’.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mcdermont, M. (2018). Alternative imaginings of regulation: An experiment in co-production. Journal of Law and Society, 45(1), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free