Systemic Therapies Following Progression on First-line CDK4/6-inhibitor Treatment: Analysis of Real-world Data

45Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (Her2−) breast cancer remains a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. First-line treatment with endocrine therapy (ET) with a cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) has largely become the standard systemic therapy. Following progression, no prospective randomized data exist to help guide second-line treatment. Materials and Methods: This study used a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database, specifically analyzing 1210 patients with HR+/Her2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who were treated in the first-line setting with a CDK4/6i from the years 2015-2020. The aim of this study was to assess what therapies were given after first-line progression on CDK4/6i and to observe treatment patterns over time. Determination of second-line treatment efficacy, specifically assessing real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed. Results: A total of 839 patients received a documented second-line therapy after progression on first-line CDK4/6i treatment. Chemotherapy was chosen for 29.7% of patients, and the use of chemotherapy decreased over time. Three hundred two (36.0%) of patients continued a CDK4/6i. Data were adjusted for age, race, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, stage at breast cancer diagnosis, and insurance payer type. Continuation of the CDK4/6i was associated with improved rwPFS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.43-0.53, P < .0001) and OS (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.26-0.35, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, J. M., Handorf, E. A., Montero, A. J., & Goldstein, L. J. (2022). Systemic Therapies Following Progression on First-line CDK4/6-inhibitor Treatment: Analysis of Real-world Data. Oncologist, 27(6), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free