Olfactory implant: Demand for a future treatment option in patients with olfactory dysfunction

27Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Therapeutic options in olfactory dysfunction (OD) are limited. Numerous studies have shown impact of OD on quality of life. Lately, various studies support benefits of olfactory training, but therapy-refractory cases leave doctors and patients locked in a stalemate. An olfactory implant (OI), in analogy to the widely successful cochlear implant, still seems far away from realization. The present study sought to evaluate the demand of OI in patients with OD. Methods: Sixty-one patients (28 females and 33 males, mean age/standard deviation 54.9/17.6 years) with OD were recruited. We performed olfactory testing for threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I) using Sniffin' Sticks; summed scores (TDI) allowed us to determine normosmia, hyposmia, and anosmia. We applied questionnaires on the importance of smell (IOS), on olfactory disorders (QOD) and on the interest/willingness for OI, considering the need for skull base/head surgery. Results: Twenty-one patients (34.4%) stated that OI could be a future treatment option for them. This decision significantly correlated with TDI, I, complaint-related questions of the QOD, and IOS (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Besser, G., Liu, D. T., Renner, B., Hummel, T., & Mueller, C. A. (2019). Olfactory implant: Demand for a future treatment option in patients with olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope, 129(2), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27476

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free