Valuable research in fake journals and self-boasting with fake metrics

6Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Valuable research works are getting wasted by publishing them in so called, fake journals (pseudo journals, hijacked or predatory journals). Fake journals are the journals which do not perform peer review or minimal language editing in the name of peer review. Unaware of negative consequences of publishing in fake journals, budding or novice academician/clinician/researcher continue to fall prey for them. Present scenario, forced them to get their valuable research published for promotion, pay hike, academic or research reputation, etc. But, they boast themselves by publishing them in fake journals with fake metrics. By making publication in fake journals, only the publishers make profit and pseudo enhance the bio-data of novice academician. It is becoming a big business. In this short communication, we have highlighted the most common prevalent issue among the novice or budding academician.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Samuel, A., & Aranha, V. (2018). Valuable research in fake journals and self-boasting with fake metrics. Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences, 13(4), 517–518. https://doi.org/10.4103/JPN.JPN_66_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free